Catching Flak

Catching Flak

Catching Flak for Political, Historical, and Cultural Comment

Catching Flak
  • Home
  • About
  • Senior Editor
Read more..

Finding Sgt. Hutchinson: The Meaning of Memorial Day

Memorial Day—like Christmas, some would say— has lost some of its true meaning for most people who observe it.

Memorial Day weekend has become the unofficial beginning of the summer season.  Nearly everyone attends a picnic, parade, or family gathering and enjoys the warm weather. Too few remember that the holiday is intended as a day of remembrance of those who died in the defense of our nation. Even fewer take the time to decorate the graves of the fallen.

Last year, as guilty as anyone, I attended a neighborhood barbeque in Troy, New York, on Memorial Day weekend. Somehow the conversation turned to a book I’ve been working on concerning US airmen shot down over Yugoslavia during World War II. Do you know, one neighbor asked, that an airman who was killed in Yugoslavia is buried nearby, in Elmwood Hill Cemetery?

Soon my girlfriend Heather and I were off to find the grave. The man’s name was Staff Sgt. Martin C. Hutchinson, and he shared a gravestone with his parents, Irene and Charles Hutchinson. We shopped for a small flag—a surprisingly difficult task considering it was Memorial Day weekend—and placed it at the site. I also resolved to use the resources at my disposal to find out more about him.

Marty Hutchinson, it turns out, was a pleasant young man with an artistic bent who looked something like the actor Colin Hanks. Like most kids in the 1930s, he was an aviation enthusiast and enjoyed making model airplanes. A year after graduating from Watervliet High School in 1941, he volunteered for the Army Air Forces hoping to become a pilot.

Hutchinson’s mediocre eyesight disqualified him from flight training. He did, however, possess remarkable mechanical aptitude. He trained at the Boeing aircraft plant in Seattle and became a B-17 flight engineer. As such, Hutchinson was the chief enlisted man on the heavy bomber’s ten-man crew. His importance in keeping the aircraft aloft was second only that of the two pilots.

Hutchinson planned to marry his girlfriend Norma before he shipped overseas. When his leave fell through, Norma flew to Texas and married him. Two days later, she followed him to Nebraska, his final staging point. There they enjoyed a few more days of married life. Norma wrote to Martin’s parents, exalting that their time together was “too wonderful to be true and too good to last.”

Hutchinson’s crew was assigned to the 2nd Bomb Group stationed in Italy. They began flying combat missions on January 24, 1944. Most of his targets were aircraft factories and transportation facilities in northern Italy, Austria, and Germany.

Hutchinson’s most costly mission occurred on February 22, 1944, during the “Big Week” all-out air offensive against the Luftwaffe. Thirty-Five B-17s from his Bomb Group took off that morning against an aircraft factory in Styr, Austria. Fourteen failed to return. Hutchinson happened to be flying in the middle of the formation. Nearly every plane to his rear was shot down by fighters, including the two directly behind him. No doubt, he felt very lucky to have survived.

On March 18, 1944, Hutchinson’s target was a vital airfield in Villaobra, Italy. Enemy fighters, determined to defend the airbase, rose and swarmed all over Hutchinson’s formation. Sometime during the dogfight, a JU-88—a German twin-engine aircraft—launched its rockets. One struck Hutchinson’s B-17 and exploded on contact, nearly severing its tail. The plane jerked violently, turned on its back, and fell into a spin.

Hutchinson was likely stationed in the upper machine gun turret, the position that flight engineers took when fighters approached. He and most of the crew were trapped inside.

Only two crewmen reached an escape hatch in the B-17’s nose. Lt. Adam Pryzyna, the bombardier, bailed out and survived.  Lt. Charles Evert, the navigator, managed to claw his way out of the hatch, but too late. By then the plane was too close to the ground and his parachute did not have time to blossom.

Yugoslavians from Gerovo, Croatia, found the wreckage the next day. Their sympathies were with the Partisan underground. They carried the airmen’s bodies to the nearest town and gave them an ornate Catholic funeral with full military honors. Every villager attended. They garlanded the graves with flowers and wreaths.

Sgt. Hutchinson is not buried at the gravesite in Troy that bears his name. A few years after his death, officials from the American Graves Registration Commission reinterned the crew’s bodies. They gave Hutchinson’s mother, Irene, the option of having his body brought home. She decided that he would have wanted to be buried with his crewmates. His final resting place is the American military cemetery in Florence, Italy: Plot H, Row 11, Grave 34.

Later, the Gold Star Mothers asked Irene if she wanted to march in a Memorial Day parade in Altamont. They told her that they wanted to honor her for giving her son to the war. “I didn’t give my son to war,” Irene snapped, “it took him.” She did not march.

Still, I like to think that Irene would not begrudge us a picnic on Memorial Day weekend—so long as the true meaning of the holiday is not forgotten. After all, one such picnic led to a better appreciation of her son’s sacrifice.

And didn’t men like Sgt. Martin C. Hutchinson give up their lives so that the rest of us could enjoy the blessings of freedom? 

May 27, 2017 Charles Stanley
Read more..

Is the State Department Swamp Draining Itself? Hardly.

First, only four career officials departed the State Department today, hardly the “Mass Exodus” reported by the Washington Post. Two other State Department Officials retired on inauguration day.

Second, CNN reports that the Trump Administration has told them that the four State Department officials were effectively fired.  

State Department officials traditionally submit their resignations at the beginning of every new administration, but it is usually a mere symbolic gesture. It appears that in this case, the four resignations were accepted.

The Trump administration’s action should hardly be considered surprising in the case of the best known of the four officials, Patrick Kennedy, the State Department’s undersecretary for management.

Trump called for Kennedy’s resignation in October, after an FBI official testified in an internal interview that Kennedy offered a quid quo pro to the FBI during its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of her private email server for public business. The unnamed FBI official claimed that Kennedy offered the FBI access to more stations abroad in return for an FBI finding that Clinton’s classified documents were not classified.

State Department officials strongly denied that such a quid-pro-quo ever occurred, but Trump accused them of “trying to cover up Hillary’s crimes of sending classified information on a server our enemies could easily access.” Trump called for Kennedy’s resignation in light of the “felony corruption.”

Kennedy also came under hard criticism in the House Report on the September 11, 2012 attack on Benghazi.

The other ousted career diplomats were the Assistant Secretary of State for Administration, Joyce Anne Barr; the Assistant Secretary of State for Consular Affairs, Michele Bond: and Ambassador Gentry O. Smith, director of the Office of Foreign Missions.

According to CNN, Kennedy, Bond, Barr, and Smith were all sent letters by the White House accepting their resignations and informing them that their service was no longer required.

The Washington Post story is part of the newspaper’s ongoing effort to falsely characterize various aspects of Trump’s presidency. Instead, The Washington Post has only reinforced its growing reputation as the poster child for fake news.   

January 27, 2017 Charles Stanley
Read more..

Cuomo Passes the Buck on Poisoned Water

On Tuesday, Cuomo Administration officials attempted to blame the Federal Environmental Agency for its own failure to warn the citizens of the upstate town of Hoosick Falls that their water was poisoned.

The statements occurred at a hearing held by the Republican-controlled state Senate. Two more Senate hearings will follow.

It was a Clintonesque pattern of delay, deny, deflect, and diffuse until the scandal cools off. For almost three hours, commissioners for the New York State departments of health and environmental conservation repeatedly claimed that the EPA had failed to provide clear guidance on the PFOA chemicals found in the town’s water supply. PFOA, a chemical used in a Teflon plant long operating in the area, has been linked to cancers, thyroid issues and other serious health problems in humans.

The contentions by Cuomo’s surrogates are contradicted by State documents proving that Governor Andrew Cuomo ignored federal findings of polluted water in the upstate rural village of Hoosick Falls.

The documents show that Cuomo’s administration dismissed Federal EPA calls to alert the people of Hoosick Falls to the crisis. Moreover, Cuomo’s officials actively disputed the concerns of the EPA specialists.

EPA has long held that 400 parts of PFOA per trillion in a water supply is dangerous. Later, they lowered the level to 100 parts and still later 70 parts per trillion. Regardless, at the time Cuomo administration officials were assuring residents that  their water was safe, the municipal water supply had already tested at 600 parts per trillion, far greater than the EPA’s original threshold.

EPA Regional Director Judith Enck was having none of Cuomo’s dissembling. “The EPA had numerous discussions with the state of New York,” Enck told POLITICO New York. “They were not confused, they disagreed. The reason they told EPA at the time was they felt like our 400 number had a large margin of safety and therefore they did not rely on that as the number to follow.”

Last December, the EPA finally bypassed Cuomo and warned residents against drinking the tainted water.  The Cuomo administration finally took action against the polluters a month later.

Don’t look for a Harry Truman-like “The Buck Stops Here” sign on Andrew Cuomo’s desk. You won’t find one.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/states/new-york/albany/story/2016/08/at-hearings-cuomo-administration-places-hoosick-falls-blame-on-epa-105069#ixzz4J8HltmP7

September 2, 2016 Charles Stanley
Read more..

Why Cruz Refused to Back Trump

Today Ted Cruz confirmed what many suspected—that he refused to endorse Donald Trump because of Trump’s personal attacks on his family.

Today Cruz confirmed that his refusal to back Trump was personal, saying he is not a “servile puppy dog” and vowing not to support anyone who wages personal attacks against his family.

Speaking to an incensed Texas delegation, Cruz explained why he broke his pledge to support the party’s official nominee.

“The day that was abdicated was the day this became personal,” Cruz said. “I’m not going to get into criticizing or attacking Donald Trump, but I’ll give you this response: I am not in the habit of supporting people who attack my wife and attack my father.”

“And that pledge was not a blanket commitment that if you go and slander and attack Heidi, I’m going to nonetheless come like a servile puppy dog and say thank you very much for maligning my wife and my father,” he added.

The mutual personal acrimony began in March, when a Pro-Cruz Super PAC released near-naked photos of Melania. Cruz denied being behind it, but Trump responded on March 23 by tweeting “Lyin’ Ted Cruz just used a picture of Melania from a shoot in his ad. Be careful, Lyin’ Ted, or I will spill the beans on your wife!” Of course, Trump had no beans to spill Instead he retaliated with the above tweet featuring Heidi Cruz and Melania Trump.

Cruz responded by taking the high road, tweeting shortly thereafter: “Donald, real men don’t attack women. Your wife is lovely, and Heidi is the love of my life.”

Cruz later addressed the situation during a television interview. “Last night Donald threatened my wife. He went directly after my wife. She is my best friend in the world,” Cruz blasted. “If Donald wants to get in a character fight, he’s better off stickin’ with me. Because Heidi is way out of his league,” he added.

The remark turned out to be a plagiarized from the 1995 Michael Douglas movie “The American President.” “You want a character debate, Bob? You better stick with me, ’cause Sydney Ellen Wade is way out of your league,” Douglas says.

Then Trump made controversial comments on abortion. Women all over the country responded negatively to the twin gaffs. It was one of the worst weeks of his campaign. Like the boy who got his hand caught in the cookie jar, Trump regretted that things had gone badly, not the crass act in itself:  “If I had to do it again,” he tweeted, “I wouldn’t have sent it”

On May 3, Cruz unloaded on Trump again as Indiana voters went to the polls, accusing him during a news conference of being a “pathological liar,” “utterly amoral,” “a narcissist at a level I don’t think this country’s ever seen” and “a serial philanderer.”

“This man is a pathological liar, he doesn’t know the difference between truth and lies … in a pattern that is straight out of a psychology text book, he accuses everyone of lying,” Cruz said as Indiana voters headed to cast their ballots.

“Whatever lie he’s telling, at that minute he believes it … the man is utterly amoral,” Cruz told reporters. “Donald is a bully … bullies don’t come from strength they come from weakness.”

“He is proud of being a serial philanderer … he describes his own battles with venereal diseases as his own personal Vietnam,” Cruz said, citing a decades-old Trump appearance on “The Howard Stern Show.”

Trump had also attacked Rafael Cruz, the Senator’s father. “And (Ted Cruz’s) father, you know, was with Lee Harvey Oswald prior to Oswald’s, you know, being shot. I mean the whole thing is ridiculous,” Trump said in an interview on “Fox and Friends.” “I mean what was he doing with Lee Harvey Oswald, shortly before the death? Before the shooting? It’s horrible.”

Trump source was the National Enquirer, which is led by friend David Pecker. Some accused Trump of planting the story.

The remark led to swift criticism from many Republicans. South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, a fierce opponent of Trump, tweeted, “Any doubt left Trump is completely unhinged? His assertion Ted Cruz’s father was associated with Lee Harvey Oswald should remove ALL doubt.”

Remember the famous quote by Henry Clay? “I’d rather be right than President.” Clay never did become President, but he was more historically significant than most of the Presidents of his time.

Time will tell if the same thing happens to Ted Cruz.

July 21, 2016 Charles Stanley
Read more..

Book Review: “Crisis of Character” Discloses Hillary’s Temperament

Crisis of Character is a tell-all book by former Secret Service agent Gary J. Byrne that reminds us—as if we need reminding—of the personal characteristics that make Hillary Clinton unfit to be President.

Byrne gained a measure of fame when he courageously told the truth about the Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinski affair in 1998 despite intense pressure to the contrary. In fact, there is more about Bill Clinton in the book than Hillary, and Byrne’s recounting of his role in the investigation is the most riveting part of his story.

It almost makes one wonder why no one has made an All the President’s Men-type movie about the Clinton scandals and impeachment. Well, we know that liberal Hollywood would never do such a thing, but there are some good independent filmmakers out there.

If you were to believe the promotion campaign for the book, you would think that it is all about Hillary Clinton. It is not, but what’s in it about her is revealing.  Without disclosing any spoilers, the presumptive Democratic nominee is shown, through several examples, to be two-faced, arrogant, manipulative, calculating, temperamental, vindictive and tyrannical.

None of this is surprising to any of us who have been paying attention to the Clintons for the past 25 years. Nevertheless, the book manages to provide an interesting and well-told view of life in the White House during the 1990s.

The latter part of the book describes Byrne’s time in as a US Air Marshall in the post 9-11 years. While these chapters have their value, they have nothing to do with the Clintons. Political junkies would do well to skip them.

If you want a better summary of the reasons why Hillary Clinton should not be President, try Clinton Cash by Peter Schweizer. But if you want a light, summer read that sheds light on her personality flaws, Crisis of Character is just the ticket.

https://www.amazon.com/Crisis-Character-Discloses-Firsthand-Experience/dp/1455568872/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1468525235&sr=1-1&keywords=crisis+of+character+gary+byrne

July 14, 2016 Charles Stanley
Read more..

FBI Settled Classified Documents Case Similar to Clinton’s

Less than one year ago, the FBI accepted a “guilty” plea from a person accused of illegally removing and retaining classified documents.

No, the settlement was not with Hillary Clinton. Bryan H. Nishimura, 50, of Folsom, California, pleaded guilty to the charge.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman immediately sentenced Nishimura to two years of probation, a $7,500 fine, and forfeiture of personal media containing classified materials. Nishimura was further ordered to surrender any currently held security clearance and to never again seek such a clearance.

According to the FBI press release, Nishimura was a Naval Reservist deployed in Afghanistan in 2007 and 2008. Nishimura had access to classified briefings and digital records that could only be retained and viewed on authorized government computers. Nishimura, however, caused the materials to be downloaded and stored on his personal, unclassified electronic devices and storage media. He carried such classified materials on his unauthorized media when he traveled off-base in Afghanistan and, ultimately, carried those materials back to the United States at the end of his deployment. The investigation did not reveal evidence that Nishimura intended to distribute classified information to unauthorized personnel.

The parallels to Mrs. Clinton’s case are obvious. You can’t make this stuff up, folks.

Here is the link to the FBI press release.

https://www.fbi.gov/sacramento/press-releases/2015/folsom-naval-reservist-is-sentenced-after-pleading-guilty-to-unauthorized-removal-and-retention-of-classified-materials

July 5, 2016 Charles Stanley
Read more..

Fellow Dems Turn on Cuomo

Even Democrats are criticizing New York Governor Andrew Cuomo over his botched handling of the Hoosick Falls water crisis.

Recently disclosed documents proved that Cuomo arrogantly ignored federal findings of polluted water in the rural upstate village.

Foremost among the Democrats turning against Cuomo are both US Senators from New York State, Chuck Schumer and Senator Kirsten Gillebrand. The Senators, plus Representative Paul Tonko, have called for Congressional hearings into Cuomo’s failure to heed Federal EPA warnings about the village’s water supply.

Schumer in particular was critical of Cuomo.

“We can’t just shrug our shoulders and say ‘oh, bad stuff happened, Schumer told Politico. “We have an obligation to those people, so a hearing is a good thing to find out what happened. But we have to do a lot more than that: water has to be cleaned up, people have to be tested, and whatever remediation occurs has to be done.”

This is not the first time that Schumer has turned on Cuomo.

Most notably, Schumer failed to defend Cuomo when U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, a Schumer protégé, launched an investigation into Mr. Cuomo’s controversial disbanding of the Moreland Commission. Cuomo had created the ethics commission, promising it would be an independent body free to investigate his office, but ended it when the commission set its sights on his own administration.

Perhaps even more telling, a Democratic State Senator, Andrea Stewart-Cousins (Dem.-Yonkers), has called for a Hoosick Falls investigation as well. Just one year ago, no Democratic State Senator—and few Republican State Senators—would have dared to challenge the famously vindictive Cuomo. Now a Democratic Senator has defied Cuomo’s leadership just when he is desperate to sweep the entire matter under the rug.

Gov. Andrew Cuomo has dismissed news reports about the state’s extended period of inaction in Hoosick Falls as a “political he-said, she-said.” Nevertheless, he cannot ignore attacks from within his own party.

Once upon a time, Cuomo hoped for a keynote speaker position, or even a vice-Presidential nod, from the upcoming Democratic convention. That’s all out the window now.

Oh, how the mighty Cuomo has fallen.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/states/new-york/albany/story/2016/06/two-top-state-democrats-now-call-for-hoosick-falls-hearings-103068#ixzz4DY7cpHPu

July 5, 2016 Charles Stanley
Read more..

Trump Mentioned Several Times in Democratic Report on Benghazi

Yesterday the Select Committee on Benghazi’s Democratic minority issued a 345 page report accusing Republican congressmen of conduction an expensive, partisan, and skewed investigation into Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s handling of the Benghazi attack.

Yet the Democratic report itself is a distorted, blatantly political document.

The Democratic report slams the Republican majority for spending more than $7 million dollars on the investigation. One is reminded of Dr. Evil’s ransom demand of “one MILLION dollars” in the Austin Powers movie. Seven million dollars barely pays for an Obama vacation these days.

Even more telling is the report’s several mentions of presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump.

What does Donald Trump have to do with the events in Benghazi? Or with the congressional investigation? Nothing, of course. Yet somehow Trump is relevant in the Democratic report.

In fact, it appears that the Democrats could hardly wait to mention Trump. His name first appears in the executive summary, on p. 8.

“During our hearing with Secretary Clinton,” the report states. “Rep. Pompeo argued that the Select Committee had obtained “over 600 requests” for security from Benghazi, but he refused to provide the evidence for his claim. Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump took up this allegation himself, claiming: “Look at Benghazi, our ambassador. He wired her 500 or 600 times asking for help.”

And?

Trump appears again on pages 135-6.

Republicans have repeatedly accused Secretary Clinton of personally and knowingly endangering the lives of the four Americans killed in Benghazi. These accusations are based on no evidence, or evidence that is unsubstantiated or distorted, and they are often cloaked in extreme rhetoric that has no basis in fact. These accusations have also been used as part of the presidential campaign and by Republican candidates for president. For example…presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump stated: “Then, instead of taking charge that night, Hillary Clinton decided to go home and sleep. Incredible.”

Wow. That’s some evidence of bias on the part of the Trey Gowdy committee!

And pages 143-3.

“Nevertheless, Republicans have spent years trying to find Secretary Clinton personally at fault for the Benghazi attacks. Select Committee Republicans expanded the scope of the investigation to cover more than a year prior to the attacks in order to try to link Secretary Clinton’s advocacy for military intervention in Libya in 2011 to the Benghazi attacks in September 2012. This argument has been adopted on the 2016 presidential campaign trail. For example, in October 2015, presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump had the following exchange on NBC’s Meet the Press….”

Thank goodness we have Congressmen like these to tell us that Republicans, including Trump, have been critical of Clinton’s botched handling of the security arrangements for the diplomatic compound, her inexcusable nonfeasance during the crisis, and her repeated lies about the causes of the attack.

And it’s the majority’s report that’s politically motivated. Oh, please.

Follow the link below for the full report

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=7&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjEwJCZscvNAhXLMz4KHeYEBpsQFgg3MAY&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdemocrats-benghazi.house.gov%2F&usg=AFQjCNEfi1ih05bf8hDpZ-C-juol1fZ5hg&sig2=xXHf2CLpcztOvLxSCWc6Og

June 28, 2016 Charles Stanley
Read more..

 There’s More Behind the Obama Redaction Debacle Than Meets the Eye.

Yesterday the FBI released redacted transcripts of the Orlando shooter’s conversations with law enforcement officials. All of Omar Mateen’s references to Islam and ISIS were eliminated. Under pressure from Speaker Paul Ryan and others, the Administration reversed itself and released the full transcript.

The transcript quotes Mateen as claiming to “pledge allegiance to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi of the Islamic State.”

But who made the original decision to redact the transcript? And who made the call to release it in full?

People presume that Obama’s Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, made the decision to redact. She was certainly tasked to defend it. “What we’re not going to do is further proclaim this man’s pledges of allegiance to terrorist groups and further his propaganda,” she declared improbably.

Obama’s Secretary Josh Earnest immediately disavowed the redaction. “All of the decisions about releasing the transcripts were made by Justice Department officials” he claimed, distancing the White House from the entire mess.

Many are skeptical that Lynch made either decision on her own. Yet even if she did, she likely made it with confidence that the White House would back her up. Obama constantly bends reality to suit his agenda. Does anyone remember when Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and UN Ambassador Susan Rice were tasked with convincing the media that the Benghazi attack was based on an internet video?

In addition, the redaction was consistent with Obama’s insistence that the FBI take a politically-correct stance with regard to Moslem-related terrorist threats. Former FBI assistant director James Kallstrom had commented on the topic just days before during an interview on The Kelly File on Fox News.

Kallstrom, who still has close ties to the FBI, said that field agents are “petrified” of being fired because of White House orders that they cannot investigate “anything to do with Muslims” in the traditional way the bureau would pursue criminals or potential criminals and terrorists.

Charles Krauthammer has argued that the reversed redaction displays a “fanatical” aversion to even an indirect aspersion against Islam. “You’ve got an administration that has no respect for historical record — for actual events. That’s a larger issue, and it’s disturbing.”

The problem here for Obama was that the truth was already disclosed by a liberal news outlet and could not be swept under the rug. Thus he pushed Loretta Lynch under the proverbial bus.

Maybe it will come out that Obama ordered the redaction. And if even if he did not, it certainly occurred in concert with the pro-Islam tenor of his Administration.

Continue reading… →

June 21, 2016 Charles Stanley 8 Comments
Read more..

Cuomo Ignored Poisoned Water Crisis

Recently disclosed documents prove that Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York ignored federal findings of polluted water in the upstate rural village of Hoosick Falls.

The documents, attained by Politico via the state’s Freedom of Information Act, show that Cuomo’s administration dismissed Federal EPA calls to alert the people of Hoosick Falls to the crisis. Moreover, Cuomo’s officials actively disputed the concerns of the EPA specialists.

Last November, the EPA finally bypassed Cuomo and warned residents against drinking the tainted water.

The water is contaminated by PFOA, a chemical used in a Teflon plant long operating in the area. PFOA has been linked to cancers, thyroid issues and other serious health problems in humans.

Local residents have long protested Cuomo’s apathy. Several of them have commissioned their own blood tests which confirm that the contaminated water has poisoned them with cancer-causing chemicals. These blood tests show much higher levels of PFOA in their bloodstream than Cuomo’s administration admits. Worst of all, children in the area are evidencing higher levels of toxins than their elders.

Nevertheless, the Democrat-dominated State Assembly declined to embarrass Cuomo by investigating the situation.

Now the recently-disclosed documents have prompted calls for further investigation.  Congressman Chris Gibson (R-Kinderhook) has asked the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform to investigate the matter.

Last week, Republican State Assemblyman Steve McLaughlin called on US Attorney Preet Bharara to conduct a probe into the Hoosick Falls water disaster. Bharara is already investigating allegations of Cuomo corruption regarding the Buffalo Billion economic development program.

Meanwhile New York’s Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, a Democrat, recently launched an investigation into ExxonMobil because he deems that the company has violated “settled science” regarding “climate change.” There is no sign of Schneiderman being concerned about the water crisis occurring within 25 miles of the state capital in Albany.

During the same time frame, the water crisis in Flint, Michigan has gained national attention and several Congressional hearings.

Where is the outcry for the citizens of Hoosick Falls?

 

June 15, 2016 Charles Stanley

Posts navigation

1 2 … 5 Next →

Categories

  • Culture (4)
  • History (4)
  • Humor (4)
  • Politics (39)

Recent Posts

  • Finding Sgt. Hutchinson: The Meaning of Memorial Day
  • Is the State Department Swamp Draining Itself? Hardly.
  • Cuomo Passes the Buck on Poisoned Water
  • Why Cruz Refused to Back Trump
  • Book Review: “Crisis of Character” Discloses Hillary’s Temperament
Powered by WordPress | theme SG Simple